3-D gimmicks, superlative kills and the founding of one of horror’s most recognizable artefacts make Friday the 13th Part III the most influential instalment in the series
Jason Voorhees was still very much a character in transition back in 1982. That may sound like a ludicrous statement given the character’s stalk-and-slash simplicity, but he was far from the finished article from a commercial standpoint. His only other appearance, save for a dream sequence as Friday the 13th‘s ill-fated neglectee, came as a peephole purveyor of death who emerged from the Camp Crystal wilderness for a shot at marquee stardom. A visual riff on The Town that Dreaded Sundown‘s brutal Phantom, Friday the 13th Part II‘s Jason was a distinctly human creation; a fallible, borderline pitiful angel of vengeance who would have his ass handed to him by the tough and determined Ginny Field (Amy Steel) in one of the finest finales of the entire series. Jason may have been a star in the making, but during a period of slasher oversaturation he was just another in a long line of POV killers. The film’s money-spinning title and a return to Camp Crystal Lake gave the character a sense of continuity, but no one could have imagined what the series would become, and Friday the 13th Part III had a significant hand in establishing the cultural juggernaut currently hacking his way out of legal limbo.
Thanks to John Carpenter’s reluctant decision to pursue a Halloween sequel as Jason’s first instalment went into production, it was Haddonfield scourge Michael Myers, dredged from the mystique-crushing annals of ambiguity and emboldened by a deathly white pallor, who was still the genre’s most recognizable attraction, even if Carpenter temporarily put the series to bed by seemingly killing off both Michael and Loomis. It’s no secret that the original Friday the 13th, despite having the deliciously deranged Pamela Voorhees as its killer, was a straight-up derivative of Carpenter’s breakout film, creator Sean Cunningham transparently suggesting, “Halloween is making incredible money at the box office. Let’s rip it off,” in a phone call to screenwriter Victor Miller, but as an exercise in successful marketing there wasn’t much in it.
Halloween was one of the most successful Indie films ever produced, raking in a cool $70,274,000 on a budget of approximately $300,000. Aping the holiday title theme first suggested to Carpenter by Black Christmas director Bob Clark, the original Friday the 13th wasn’t too far behind, managing a whopping $59,800,000 on a budget of only $550,000. Their respective sequels were considerably less successful, but Myers still edged it, posting returns of $25,500,000 to Jason’s $21,700,000. The following year, Carpenter was through with a presumed-dead Myers, opting for ill-fated spin-off Halloween III: Season of the Witch, a sequel that put the series in limbo for more than half a decade. With a Myers-shaped void just waiting to be filled, it was finally time for Jason to stamp his authority.
Ironically, Halloween II took a leaf out of Jason’s book by upping the gore and submitting to the same slasher formula that the original Halloween unwittingly triggered, but when Friday the 13th Part III went into development in 1981, it was first pitched as a Halloween II rip-off. Initially set in a psychiatric hospital, the idea was to have Jason track down the surviving Ginny, offing a bunch of fellow patients and doctors in the interim. Steel, who producers envisaged as their Jamie Lee Curtis going forward, was originally approached to reprise the role, but turned it down with a view to shedding the slasher stigma and broadening her horizons.
Well, first we take our clothes off, and then you get on top of me or I can get on top of you.Debbie
Steel’s decision was rewarded with regular work in two short-lived TV shows, but the roles quickly dried up, the actress tempted back into the slasher fray four years later for Paramount’s cinematic prank April Fool’s Day. Steel, who for many proved the most memorable final girl in a series that would place less emphasis on characterization going forward, would later regret rejecting the role, as would her many fans, but it’s hard to imagine the series having such longevity away from its iconic Camp Crystal setting, which along with the film’s title was still the biggest draw of the series in 1982. It was also the place in which Jason procured one of modern horror’s most valuable commercial artefacts.
Though vital to the evolution of the Jason character, Friday the 13th Part III was something of a devolution for the series as credible horror. In the absence of Steel, a brand new final girl was required, but with the slasher formula very much established in the minds of the teenage demographic, acting ability took a backseat to appealing physical attributes, something that left uncredited screenwriter Petru Popescu, recruited to make the screenplay “more sinister and menacing,” feeling somewhat futile. Having sat in on the casting sessions, Popescu was surprised by Steve Miner’s idea of who the latest final girl should be, which differed greatly from his own.
The role of protagonist Chris Higgins went to a young Dana Kimmell, who would find regular work in the early 80s with one-off appearances in popular TV shows such as Happy Days, The A-Team and Dynasty. All-American beauty Kimmell certainly looked the part, with an endearing quality that put her firmly in the realms of sympathetic victim, but she was no Amy Steel, and Kimmell would all but confirm Popescu’s suggestion that actors were cast for purely aesthetic reasons. “I had done a film called Sweet Sixteen, and I guess the producer/director saw me in that,” she would explain. “I went for an audition and basically met with Steve Miner and that was it. I didn’t have to do a whole lot of auditioning for it.”
Despite its superficial intentions, Friday the 13th Part III manages to achieve that “sinister and menacing” quality thanks in large part to the late Richard Brooker’s one and only appearance as Jason and a series of graphic kills that brought our villain out of the POV shadows, but some of the acting is painfully melodramatic, particularly a scene in which Kimmell recalls a prior meeting with Camp Crystal’s perennial scourge, allowing her the significant honour of being the only final girl to escape Jason’s clutches on two separate occasions (though why he decided to let her live is anyone’s guess). Acting imperfections aside, Higgins proves herself rather resourceful by the movie’s end, adopting a take-no-prisoners attitude that sees her smash Jason in the face with a shovel, hang him from a barn and impale him with an axe. Higgins may be as sweet as apple pie, but she has a surprisingly tough crust, and is certainly one of the most striking final girls in the series.
On the whole, Friday the 13th Part III is the first instalment in which our cast become truly throwaway, forging the fickle, yet strangely rewarding template for the series going forward. It’s not as shallow as the series would become during Jason’s more self-aware period, but it’s arguably the leanest in terms of characterization pre-A New Beginning. There is still a half-assed attempt to give our characters enough personality to make them sympathetic, but on the whole they’re generic types set up for the slaughter, particularly a pair of far-out stoners designed to tap into the popularity of the Cheech and Chong movies. Paul Kratka’s Rick, despite playing host to a 3-D effect for the ages, is a contender for blandest deuteragonist in cinematic history. Resident jock Andy Beltrami isn’t far behind in the forgettable stakes, though he is victim to what is ‘hands-down’ the most brutal and deserving kill of the entire series, even topping Axel’s unceremonious head-snapping and super bitch Melissa’s axe to the face (if you’re hand-standing around a secluded cabin with a history of mass murders, you deserve everything you get).
Of all the kids in Friday the 13th Part III, Larry Zerner’s overweight prankster, Shelley, the character responsible for providing Jason with his visual trademark, is probably the most memorable, which is ironic since Zerner wasn’t an actor at all, and was actually cast having been randomly scouted on the street. Shelley is the physical manifestation of marmite. His constant whining and lame attempts at wooing the exceedingly beautiful Vera (Catherine Parks) are either oddly charming or crawl under your skin like a particularly rampant bout of scabies, depending on your predilection.
In a series renown for its shameless beauty discrimination, Shelley is the first stereotypical geek to meet a tragic, Jason-led demise. Part II’s equally geeky prankster, Ted, would precede Shelley, but the Friday formula wasn’t as refined in 1981, and Ted manages to evade death by pounding booze at an all-night bar while his successor succumbs to a rather nasty throat-slitting for simply trying to earn respect. It’s amazing how geeks were punished so ruthlessly in the realms of slasherdom, while pristine beauties, albeit the frigid kind, found a way to overcome the odds. America sure put a lot of stock in the high school hierarchy during the Reagan 80s.
Shelley and Vera’s awkward pairing is fairly touching in the feeblest possible sense. You get the feeling Vera genuinely cares for him, which makes her ruthless dispatch all the more devastating, and you have to feel a little sorry for Shelley, even if there are times when you wish you could grab Jason’s machete and do the job for him. The pair’s heroic excursion to a local convenience store also introduces us to the film’s wild card, a gang of random biker punks who, Jason aside, are the most endearing characters in the entire movie, giving credence to composer Harry Manfredini’s equally left-field disco splurge. Some find both a distraction, reducing Popescu’s “more sinister and menacing” intentions to outright silliness at a time when slashers were still admired for their anarchic cynicism, but despite its graphic brutality and moments of grim foreboding, Friday the 13th Part III excels at being silly ― some of it purposeful, some of it not so much. Naturally, the film’s gimmicky and problematic endeavour into the realms of Reagan-era 3-D was front and centre.
It’s no secret that the 3-D concept itself proved a long and troublesome process in terms of refinement. Before the mathematical advancements of IMAX eliminated eye fatigue at the tail-end of the 20th century, 3-D had proven a problematic concept going back decades. This was mainly due to the technical difficulties and financial burdens placed on studios whose main goal was to create as much profit as possible, which typically meant limiting risk. A patent for the 3-D process was filed by British film pioneer William Friese-Greene way back in 1890, but it was a quarter of a century later in 1915 that the first test reels were presented to audiences in red-green anaglyph through the use of a stereoscope.
The earliest 3-D film shown to a public audience, screened at the Ambassador Hotel Theater in Los Angeles, was Nat G. Deverich’s silent drama The Power of Love. Filmed in dual-strip in black and white, single strip colour anaglyphic release prints were produced, which required a single projector and the red and blue anaglyph glasses that became the commercial selling point for future 3-D attractions. Despite the stumbling blocks of two world wars, the introduction of Polaroid Filters to the stereoscopic process, an invention originally designed to reduce glare in car headlights, saw 3-D grow into a viable mainstream option.
It was with the popularising of colour cinema that 3-D truly began to take off. Beginning with Arch Oboler’s Bwana Devil, the first colour stereoscopic film, the format continued to evolve and introduce various features, including the addition of stereophonic sound and Cinemascope, but by 1953 the novelty was beginning to wear thin, an abundance of financial and technical problems, some of which affecting audience enjoyment, seeing the gimmick’s stock plummet. A second string of films were presented in 3-D, but the uneconomical process meant that many were shown in 2-D, including Alfred Hitchcock’s 1954 classic Dial M For Murder, which was subjected to audience walk-outs and shown exclusively in 2-D thereafter. But 3-D would rise again.
The format’s latest revival arrived at the turn of the 1980s thanks to that dependable selling point nostalgia, which, due to the current generation’s obsession with all things 80s, has become a billion-dollar industry in recent years. Nostalgia is cyclical, and in the 1980s everyone was mad about the 1950s. Cold War horror was subjected to an era of practical effects-heavy reboots, movies such as John Carpenter’s The Thing and David Cronenberg’s The Fly paying homage to the kitsch monster movies of yore, but it wasn’t just horror that received the nostalgia treatment. Stephen King’s Stand By Me was one of many 80s movies built on rock ‘n roll reminiscence, Robert Zemeckis’ sci-fi smash Back to the Future quite literally travelling back in time to a place that brought it all flooding back for sentimental thirtysomethings across America.
And so began the short-lived, Reagan-era 3-D revival, focusing mainly on the horror genre at a time when the slasher picture ruled the roost. Billed as the first horror film to be released in 3-D in twenty years, 1982’s Parasite, another 50s throwback, led the way, and re-releases of past efforts such as Hitchcock’s previously ill-fated Dial M For Murder soon followed, but it was three horror franchise releases – Friday the 13th Part III, Amityville 3D and Jaws 3D – that are most remembered, and not very fondly for the most part.
Despite the usual technical and financial difficulties, those first two franchise releases did rather well at the box office. Thanks to the draw of being able to witness Spielberg’s monstrous creation coming through the screen (well, kind of), Jaws 3D raked in a rather impressive $88,000,000 on a budget of just $15,000,000, and though the Friday the 13th series had nowhere near as much stock, Jason’s second outing was a significant improvement on its predecessor commercially. Ironically, Friday the 13th Part III, screened in 1,079 theatres across the US (813 of which were 3-D capable) knocked Spielberg’s colossal hit ET: The Extraterrestrial off the top of the US Box Office charts, becoming the second highest-grossing horror of 1982 behind Tobe Hooper’s Poltergeist, a movie that Spielberg was also directly involved with. It was also the first 3-D film to receive a wide domestic release. Given this distinct advantage, Friday the 13th Part III remained Jason’s most successful outing as a marquee killer until 2003’s Freddy vs Jason.
With a domestic box office return of $36,690,067, Paramount’s 3-D gamble proved a huge success, but once again the novelty soon wore thin. By the time the woefully received Amityville 3D was released on November 18, 1983, a $6,000,000 film that managed only $300,000 in profit, the 3-D revival was already heading for hibernation. The format was a much weaker draw than it was back in the 1950s, and the 80s wave of 3-D movies just weren’t very good. In a decade renown for excess, the main issue was the way in which 3-D was rammed down audiences throats, something Friday the 13th Part III is arguably the most guilty of.
The majority of Part III’s silliness derives from its eagerness to cram-in as many 3-D moments as it can. Don’t get me wrong, its use also results in some of the most memorable kills in the series, but the amount of innocuous moments dedicated to the process proves tedious to the point where you can’t help but chuckle in disbelief. It’s like a prolonged joke that goes from a giggle to a slight smile to utter, joyless despondency, but then back to a smile and a giggle, all the way up to inane giddiness. You have your unnecessary scares like a striking snake, a leaping rake and a crudely presented eyeball from the film’s Hitchcockian harbinger of death (a cheap replacement for the deceased Crazy Ralph), which are completely ineffective but forgivable, but swinging bales of hay, descending yoyos, laborious displays of juggling? What’s all that about? And if you’re not tickled by the sheer absurdity of it all you’re going to have to conjure rare endurance because they stretch on forever, particularly if you’re watching in flat 2-D.
The capturing of those scenes was even more laborious. First of all a new kind of lens had to be developed for fears that faulty projection lenses would prohibit the film from achieving a wide theatrical release, which would have been devastating to such a typically low-risk franchise. Originally, Paramount leased two 3-Depix cameras from the Marks Polarized Corporation, but soon decided to develop a 3-D lens exclusive to Paramount, one that was incompatible with Marks projection lenses. Legal problems inevitably followed. MPC filed a $25,000,000 lawsuit based on Paramount’s attempts to monopolize the market by offering reductions to those who chose to lease projection lenses directly from them. MPC were ultimately credited for their part in the movie, but an injunction that would have required Paramount to change its equipment was promptly denied.
The execution of the film’s copious 3-D moments proved just as problematic. Due to the crew’s inexperience with the new lens technology, shots would sometimes take hours to set up, the effects so tricky to capture that cast members were forced to endure multiple takes. This was no reflection on their ability to deliver their lines. Miner and his crew were almost solely concerned with the crowd-pleasing visuals Paramount were counting on to boost the box office following the previous instalment’s comparatively underwhelming returns. During the convenience store confrontation, Larry Zerner required more than ten takes to simply hit the lens with a wallet, an arduous task that resulted in arguably the most pointless and ineffective 3-D effect in the entire movie.
All of this affects the film’s pacing, but despite its flaws Friday the 13th Part III is still my absolute favourite of the series. ‘Friday’ fans can usually be divided into two groups ― those who dig Jason’s brutal earlier outings and those who dig the silliness of those later instalments. I’m a fan of both, and for me Friday the 13th Part III strikes the perfect balance between comical absurdity and brooding malevolence, one punctuated by that quirky left-field score, a fitting accompaniment for a film that frolics in the zany waters of some out-there wilderness. The film’s superficial 3-D antics may be cack-handed at times, but Friday the 13th is that rare mainstream franchise that succeeds as trashy, fast food cinema. It’s not supposed to be credible. It’s pure, mindless fun, and as long as the kills live up to Jason’s fearsome reputation, something severely lacking in those later instalments, the sillier the better.
It also features some of my favourite kills in the series, which are superlative viewed in either dimension thanks to Return of the Living Dead practical effects artist Allan A. Apone. Friday the 13th Part III was subjected to the usual cuts, but none of them devastating enough to detract from Vera’s ruthless harpooning, Andy’s brutal hacking and the infamous eye-popping that perfectly encapsulates the inimitable tone of Miner’s second and final outing. In fact, the film’s most notable omission is the fabled alternate ending that went against the victorious final girl trope synonymous with the series.
In the original ending, which is just as batty as the rest of the film, Chris takes a leaf out of original final girl Alice’s book, escaping to the Crystal Lake waters in a canoe, only this time it’s Jason’s dead mother who emerges to drag her under in a quite ludicrous nod to the first instalment, (wasn’t she decapitated?). Sadly, there is no surviving footage believed to be in existence, but production stills of the scene have since been released, which not only reveal an alternate look for an unmasked Jason designed by none other than practical effects maestro Stan Winston, they also allow us to piece together a shock ending that sees Chris ruthlessly decapitated. Hardly traditional, but certainly in-line with the film’s cavalier nature and violent extravagances.
Friday the 13th Part III is notable for much more than it’s shoddy 3-D gimmick and a series of censor-defying kills. Paramount’s 3-D pursuit may have been the short-sighted gambit designed to temporarily boost box office numbers, but it was a happy accident that secured the future of the franchise going forward. Ultimately, this is Jason’s movie, the instalment that would forge one of horror’s most recognisable and enduring icons, and much of that has to be accredited to the absolutely inspired decision to have Jason ditch the peephole pillowcase for the dead-eyed hockey mask, though no one person can lay claim to that particular eureka. Like many of the most inspired creative decisions in the annals of horrordom, happenstance intervened.
According to Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th, the signature artefact was unearthed during a lighting check designed to test the continuingly troublesome 3-D technology. A mask was yet to be decided upon. It’s so easy to get that kind of thing wrong ― what may seem scary at the time could end up making a mockery out of the character ― so hockey fan and 3-D effects supervisor Martin Sadoff grabbed his Detroit Red Wings goaltender mask as a temporary aid. Miner immediately liked what he saw. This soon-to-be ubiquitous image became something else entirely on former trapeze artist Richard Brooker’s intimidating 6’3″ frame. Using a process known as VacuForm, the mask was enlarged to create a cast suitable for the character’s makeup, and after holes were added and red triangles strategically placed by art director Terry Ballard, a marquee giant was born. Some things are so obvious you just don’t see them coming.
[to Jason] No! You can’t be alive!Chris
Brooker’s casting was another happy accident precipitated by Paramount’s notorious thrift. Friday the 13th Part II‘s Steve Daskawicz was initially set to reprise the role of Jason, but since the studio had moved production to the West Coast to limit expenditure, the East Coast based Daskawicz was asked to pay his own airfare, which he naturally declined to do. Daskawicz did a fantastic job as Jason, lending the character a bestial fragility that really sets the instalment apart, but Brooker has always been my favourite portrayer.
Jason would grow even more indestructible thanks to The Final Chapter‘s Ted White, who brought a frenetic savagery to the character, and later the hugely popular Kane Hodder, who gave us a marauding character of comic book invincibility, but there’s something so disquieting about Brooker’s performance. His lumbering frame and docile manner make him the most ominous incarnation in the series, giving us an animal who shares the raw savagery of a mountain bear and the head-cocking inquisitiveness of a small puppy. He brings such a quiet inevitability to the role. The casual manner in which he lumbers away in search of his next victim having just harpooned Vera is so disconcertingly blunt. For the first time in the series we see our masked killer plain as day, his identity no longer confined to the prerequisite climax. It’s an iconic moment in the series, Jason’s first step to becoming the antihero audiences would soon embrace.
For me, Friday the 13th Part III is the most complete instalment of the series, warts and all. It may have began as a cynical punt at franchise longevity, a rather fickle one given the 3-D format’s fleeting resurgence, but accidentally or otherwise it was vital for the franchise long-term. If Part II introduced us to one of trash horror’s most iconic creations, then Part III set the bar for the antagonist-led brutality that would prove such a low-budget smash. Few franchises transcend established folklore, but for many Friday the 13th is no longer an unlucky day in Western tradition, it’s Jason day, a testament to the legacy of both the franchise and the character Friday the 13th Part III shaped into a commercial beast. Strangely, Jason is never once referred to by name throughout the entire movie. Sometimes appearances really are everything.
Brilliant article. I’m the same as you, I think it has the perfect balance between great horror and silliness but I love it as possibly one of the best films in the series. Having met Kane Hodder and CJ Graham, they too said that Richard Brooker was the best at playing Jason. I loved the piece! Well done and thank you, you’ve made my day.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s an absolute pleasure. I actually had you in mind writing this one. I think I may have promised Jason Lives next but I was in the mood for tackling my favourite in the series. I had no idea that Brooker is both Graham and Hodder’s favourite Jason. They’ve got good taste. He brings such menace to the role. I love Ted White but wouldn’t have minded seeing Brooker return for another instalment.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Neither would I. Brooker brought a really evil Jason to the screen. He had the swagger and the presence to make his version truly memorable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another excellent essay, and high praise making this Friday (and look, today IS Friday the 13th!) your favorite, Edison (mine is Jason Lives for the latter films, The Final Chapter for the early ones, although I may have mentioned that on a previous post).
Since I viewed this one on VHS (owned the cassette from 1994-2002) the 3-D effects are lost on me (I only learned about what was done & why with those effects from The Crystal Lake doc), but that doesn’t sway my appreciation for this entry in the series.
I’m glad that production was unable to go with the psychiatric hospital setting & storyline, as much as I enjoyed Amy Steel’s Ginny; the way pursued was the way to go in my eyes (watching that doc made me like Dana Kimmell’s Chris character more, and I’m relieved she didn’t lose her head:-).
Yeah, I thought the killings were great, and I enjoyed the characters presented, even if the characterization were 2-D (in a 3-D film): I thought The Bikers were all a fun threat (the gas siphoning, to me, was a good setup for the showdown later in the film), I liked the Shelly & Vera duo (very cute to me, and Catherine Parks is right alongside Judie Aronoson as the females in this series that I find very attractive. “Vera attractive”? Yes:-), and how can I quibble with the film which introduces the hockey mask?
Oh, that disco theme, consider me a fan: a little silly (it conjures up images of Scooby-Doo for me; and just like in Scooby-Doo, the perpetrator is unmaked, well, except Jason himself gives his own reveal to Chris there), a bit eerie, and all right by me. Hey, it’s something Jamie Lee Curtis can dance to at Prom Night, you suppose?
Sorry about the late reply. I’m struggling with the flu at the moment.
Thanks for the kind words regarding the article.
To be honest, Part 2, The Final Chapter and Jason Lives are just as enjoyable on their day, but there’s something about Part 3 that really hits home. I love its nutty balance of out-there silliness and sheer brutality, and Brooker has always been my favourite Jason Portrayer. Plus, he gets his mitts on that iconic mask.
This time I went with a double bill of The Final Chapter and A New Beginning — which, by the way, is another favourite and growing fast. That is one crazy movie. So many WTF?! moments. If it weren’t for the fact that it was so heavily butchered by the MPAA, it would be another contender for absolute favourite instalment in the series.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope you begin to feel better ASAP Edison; the flu is a tough bug, and I wish you well.
I agree, I think Richard Brooker made a great Jason, and I enjoyed his commentary on the Crystal Lake doc. He played the Jason in the way that us viewers & the mainstream public have come to know the character as, and in my mind he was the first “real” Jason. Great athletic movement, fearsome body language…he set the mold for future Jason incarnations.
Oh yeah, I’m all about “Friday the 13th: A New Beginning”. Even as a kid I thought it was great, and I wasn’t even fazed by the big reveal in the end. You’re right, the MPAA had a party with the film (which makes me surprised a lot of the nudity survived; usually nudity is the first thing to take off in the US:-), and even still you could tell it was a bloodbath. For me, when those censors get on a roll, I just fill in the blanks with my mind, but still, what a body count! As an adult I later enjoyed the general misdirection & mystery of this particular entry, since I think it harkens back to how the series began (it truly is a new beginning). I like the film so much, I once named one of my cats Reggie the Reckless (“Reggie” for short, and he was reckless: he had a fascination with bathtubs when they were filled with water:-). Without regards to censorship of how the series evolved, my three favorites are parts 6, 4, & 5, in that order; that’s my Jason sweet spot really.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, mate. Hopefully I’ll be feeling better next week.
I loooove A New Beginning. It’s like a messed-up Scooby Doo mystery. So many absurd moments. The moment when Tommy is pranked, flips out and slings that feller through the table is just priceless. Always makes me laugh out loud. The Damn enchiladas! moment. The obvious evil-eyed close-ups of Roy. Ethal and Junior. The senseless axe murder. The fact that the usually dismissive sheriff suspects Jason, even though they’re not at Camp Crystal Lake. The fact that Tommy is suddenly ten years older…
It’s ludicrous from start to finish. Unashamedly so. I watch it more than any other instalment. So easy to sit through. Glorious nonsense. 😁
LikeLiked by 2 people
Halloween completely lost its shit.
It’s interesting that there are so many alternate cuts of 6 but none of them make sense. And the fact that they try to make Michael a victim. It’s so misguided. Myers thrives on less. That kind of detail is mystique-crushing. He’s pure and simply evil.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ha ha, I agree, those moments make the 5th Friday the 13th a real trip: I mean, Ethel with the chicken (“yeee-ya!”), Demon & Anita’s port-o-potty misadventure, the random guy (I never knew his name was Raymond Joffroy) who shows up at Ethel’s door and later gets killed when spying on Tina & Eddie, the time warp greasers with the stalled car…just one interesting character and thing after another from my point of view:-).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Confession: I viewed the 6th Halloween film in the theater, and took a good friend along as well (we remained friends afterward:-). Yeah, so, we actually paid to see that thing. Well, at least Paul Rudd was in it!
I am of the same mind that Michael Myers needs little explanation or backstory (unlike a Freddy Krueger, who’s universe was much more pliable): trying to milk the character for everything that he was worth sure took some strange turns, since after awhile there just wasn’t anywhere to go. The 3rd Halloween had the right idea (lots of people like anthologies), it’s just too bad that it wasn’t widely accepted at the time.
LikeLiked by 1 person